Lsi Paper Leadership and Organizational

LSI Paper Leadership and Organizational Behavior Anne Peters 07/21/2012 My primary feather idea means with the highest percentile is being competitive at 99 percentile. I actu altogethery never realized this aspect close to my thinking expression and now it only casts sense. In the former(prenominal) I form been so busy winning and showing other large number losing that I totally forgot to pay attention on my own performance, I guess glory isnt that important, what really important is how I achieved it.At home, Ill always be busy competing with the siblings and at work I was always comparing myself to others, wherefore not paying attention on my performance. My indirect thinking style is my Affiliative thinking style at 96 percentile. I totally agree with this as I do pay a divvy up of emphasis on relationships. I am genuinely prompt and open about attending and interacting with invigorated people from diametric pagan backgrounds and have a keen interest in l aut horizeing different languages. This thinking style helped me smash good interpersonal skills.At home I have great relationship with my p bents and siblings. At work I am always deemed as the favorite manager I am very understanding and friendly. My limiting thinking style would be distractance-thinking style I believe instead of dealing with the problems I usually walk extraneous from them, which is not a good trait. A problem moldiness be solved instead of letting it lingering in the back of your mind. I may be overly hard on myself. When I make a mistake, it is especially difficult for myself to forgive myself and move on.This can leave backside in a fear of failure, and the feeling that I must avoid situations that carry the risk of personal defeat. I usually refrain from examining and expressing feelings, which could note a more than than general pattern of withdrawal. For example in the past I have turned small problems into colossal problems overtime since I didnt fe el like tackling them then and there. I had relationship problems and cash problems because of my avoidance thinking style.In 2006 I was moving out of my uncles post and things went sour in between his family and mine, but since I was young and judicious I completely ignored the problem instead of dealing with it, later on the problem was huge and couldnt be tackled anymore and work this day I have weirdness involved when meeting up with his family. Impact of my personal styles on my prudence style cookery When it comes to supply my competitive, perfectionist and feat thinking style play a big contribution. Planning requires being competitive, you make true whatever you are planning is magna cum laude enough and efficient.Perfectionist thinking style helps it to be without flaws and no room for errors. acquirement style helps me to be somewhat confident and easily able to meet challenges. Organizing Again the perfectionist plays a big role in organizing also. The humanis tic style helps me in guiding other people towards organization and guiding them and encouraging their effort. I feel organizing is not the strongest management area for me and I conduct to work on this skill. Leading The thinking style of self-actualization, competitive, and power, plays a huge role in helping me lead.I am pretty self-actualized, which means I am really comfor get acrossnessable with myself and who I am. For being a attraction one unavoidably to be competitive otherwise you cant lead if you have the mentality of if we lose thats ok, its more like no We got to win I like being in charge and in control of a situation, its very typical of me, the sense of being in pendant makes me comfor accede in a confidential information slip. I believe in leading by example style of management, instead of telling people what to do a manager needs to show them how its done and then audit to make sure they are sound as good as you or your crush employee.Controlling The pow er, competitive and humanistic thinking style plays a huge role of me being controlling in my work environment. A manager must manage, to be in control one needs to earn treasure of their employees, to do so you need to work with them and not once morest them. Once you earn their trust, they will probably perform the same way whether you are inadvertence them or not. To be in control you dont have to be a power hungry manager who always thinks hes right, but more of a understanding people at their level and culture manager.Its easy to get into employees comfort zone even if you know one thing about their language, ethnicity or culture. Once the barrier is down they respect you and controlling them becomes a lot easier. Genesis I develop all this thinking style at quite an early stage I was 21 when I set-back moved from Karachi, Pakistan to Chicago, United States. Since the beginning I was working a management position in a dissolute food restaurant and way out to school because I wanted to and there was no obligation. The competiveness was there but as I worked the management position I developed legion(predicate) other thinking styles.The self actualized and humanistic style was developed with the helped of my parents they brought me up with a lot of love and made me feel confident about every decision that I wanted to make. Having parents like mine makes a huge difference in ones thinking style. I worked as a general manager at a fast food restaurant for quite a while and then was chartered as a creative designer and HR for a new concept restaurant that was serving Lebanese food. This opportunity helped me polish my Humanistic, competitive, perfectionist and achievement thinking styles even more.And recently I moved to southern calcium to start another concept restaurant by leaving everything behind and taking another major change in my life hence making me a big risk taker. Overall I am pretty satisfied with my LSI results, although I have realized th ere are aspects I really need to work on, but then again nobody is perfect. The areas that I need to work on are formal I really need to follow my heart and Ideas more than just be by the book. Dependent I shouldnt be dependent on other people for approval, ometimes I need to do things on my own. Avoidance I need to deal with problems right there and in the face instead of slacking. Competitive Need to be a puny less competitive and let other people get frontward and limit from them. Achievement I need to work on my goals a little bit more, be more goal oriented than alert day to day. Oppositional Be a little less oppositional and be more open to other peoples ideas. I plan to learn to be a better management from this class and apply all these new thinking style I never know I had.Hopefully in the future Ill be able to fine-tune all this style to become a better performing manager. NameD01673320 examine Survey Taken Your LSI Styles ProfileThe raw and percentile wads in the ta ble below and the extensions on the circumplex shown below depict your perceptions of how you think and behave. The CONSTRUCTIVE Styles (11, 12, 1, and 2 oclock positions) reflect self-enhancing thinking and behavior that contribute to ones level of satisfaction, ability to develop healthy relationships and work effectively with people, and proficiency at accomplishing tasks.The PASSIVE/ defensive Styles (3, 4, 5, and 6 oclock positions) represent self-protecting thinking and behavior that promote the follow upment of auspices needs through interaction with people. The AGGRESSIVE/DEFENSIVE Styles (7, 8, 9, and 10 oclock positions) find self-promoting thinking and behavior used to maintain status/position and fulfill security needs through task-related activities. Position Style Score centile 1 Humanistic-Encouraging 35 80 2 Affiliative 39 96 3 Approval 28 95 4 Conventional 25 93 5 Dependent 23 90 6 Avoidance 13 83 Oppositional 15 87 8 Power 13 79 9 Competitive 29 99 10 Perfecti onistic 24 75 11 Achievement 33 63 12 Self-Actualizing 37 93 The raw punctuates potentially range from 0 to 40. The percentile take a shits represent your results compared to those of 9,207 individuals who previously completed the Life Styles Inventory. For example, a percentile score of 75 means that you scored higher along a particular position than 75% of the other respondents in the sample and, in turn, indicates that the style stand for by that position is strongly descriptive of you.In contrast, a score of 25 means that you scored higher than only about 25% of the other respondents and accordingly indicates that the style represented by that position is not very descriptive of you. Your LSI Styles CircumplexFor detailed descriptions of each of these 12 styles,? click on the circumplex graphic in each of the 12 sections. Examining your CircumplexTo accurately interpret your LSI results, it is important for you to consider your score on each style in terms of its range (high , medium, or low) on the profile. The three ranges correspond to the percentile points in the circumplex and in the table above.