The Government Should Respect Property Rights Essay -- Expository Exem

The Government Should Respect Property Rights Imagine youve been enjoying your backyard air table and chairs for the past 10 years when suddenly, for no app atomic number 18nt reason, you are served notice from a government agency that you will be fined $6,000 a day unless you remove them.Or, imagine you would like to add a colliery walkway to your garden. You begin to research the procedure and costs, only to learn that a lengthy application will be required, with multiple hearings before a state commission. You find yourself embroiled in a Kafkaesque sancti wholenessd battle costing tens of thousands of dollars. Finally, after years of struggle the government demands, as a condition for approving your little walkway, that you donate a grammatical constituent of your land to the state.Do these sound like nightmarish stories out of near totalitarian regime?Shockingly, they are normal, everyday incidents for suitablety owners across the nation.In atomic number 20, for example, a state agency called the California coastal Commission routinely tramples the property rights of coastal landowners. People residing within five miles inland of Californias 1,100 miles of coastline are subject to the commissions power to revere or deny improvements involving any solid structure on their property. This can include adding a room to a home, planting trees, adding a debate or garden walkway and, yes, in one current orangeness County case, a picnic table and chairs. Established in 1976, the California Coastal Commissions mandate is to preserve, protect . . . and restore the resources of the coastal order for the enjoyment of the current and succeeding generations. The Commission operates on the premise that the rough 1.5 million acres under its jurisdiction are a... ...erty without permission from his tenant. earnest San Francisco certain homes designated as affordable can be sold for no more than a government-controlled price. In Portland there are wide swaths o f the metropolis in which one cannot build a single-family home on ones own land, even if it is adjacent to other suburban homes. In hundreds of U.S. cities, various laws establishing historical districts, landmarks, or improvement zones straightjacket owners who are accordingly unable to remove trees, erect fences, add rooms, or even change over rain gutters.Government boards, agencies and commissions with this kind of authority should be opposed not on a case-by-case basis, but on principle. The only proper state policy with respect to private property is hands get through In America, no governmental agency should have the power to disrobe an individual of his property rights.